Assessment and feedback for higher education

5 universities
Mandatory ЗВО чл. 76-77 See details →

The Problem

Universities conduct faculty attestation once a year - with paper surveys, manual data entry, and reports that arrive months later. The process is expensive, slow, and yields a snapshot, not a trend.

Students rarely complete paper surveys - participation is under 20%. Results are not linked to specific courses or time periods, making them useless for operational decisions. Leadership has no mechanism for early detection of teaching quality issues.

The Solution

kazva.bg replaces paper attestations with continuous digital feedback across multiple channels - QR codes in every classroom, Moodle integration linking feedback to specific courses and instructors, email signature links, and social channels students already use.

Dynamic questionnaires adapt automatically to the course type - lectures, labs, and seminars each get targeted questions. Administrative services like the registrar, library, and IT helpdesk get their own QR stickers for instant feedback at every touchpoint.

Leadership gets a real-time dashboard with NPS by instructor, faculty, and semester. Individual lecturers receive daily and weekly automated summaries in their own dashboard - and can generate their own QR codes, embed feedback links in presentations, or create custom polls.

What the law requires from your educational institution

Higher Education Act, Art. 76-77

Mandatory annual student opinion surveys

Loss of accreditation = loss of the right to issue diplomas

Enforcement: NEAA (accreditation)

kazva.bg provides documented survey infrastructure — data is ready for NEAA accreditation

Pre-school and School Education Act / NIKO

Quality checks through surveys with students and parents

Enforcement: NIKO, Ministry of Education

The same platform works for schools and universities

Research-backed evidence

Springer Meta-analysis, 23 studies d = 0.27 effect size

Student feedback produces 3–4 months of additional learning progress at minimal cost - one of the most cost-effective interventions in education.

OECD TALIS, 48 countries 71% of teachers say feedback improved their teaching

Structured feedback promotes a culture of professional growth, not just evaluation.

Features

Dynamic questionnaires

Questionnaires adapt to the course type - lectures, labs, and seminars each receive targeted questions with branching logic.

Individual lecturer dashboards

Every lecturer gets a personal dashboard with daily and weekly automated summaries of their feedback scores and trends.

Administrative services feedback

QR stickers at every office - registrar, library, IT helpdesk - capture service quality feedback alongside teaching evaluations.

Moodle integration

Feedback links directly to specific courses and enrolled students, giving context that paper surveys never could.

Lecturer self-service

Lecturers generate their own QR codes, embed feedback links in presentations, and create custom polls - no IT department needed.

100+ man-hours saved
8.8/10 avg. professor rating
<30s per evaluation

Ready to transform your feedback?

Get in touch to discuss how kazva.bg can help your organization.

Book a 25-minute consultation