Net Promoter Score (NPS) — Glossary | kazva.bg
Net Promoter Score (NPS) is the most widely used customer-loyalty metric. Definition, formula, history, benchmarks, and how it compares to CSAT and CES.
Definition
Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a customer-loyalty metric that measures how willing customers are to recommend a company, product, or service to others. It is calculated from a single survey question — "How likely are you to recommend [organisation] to a friend or colleague?" — answered on a 0-10 scale. The result is a single number between -100 and +100.
The NPS formula
NPS = % Promoters − % Detractors
Respondents are classified by their score:
- Promoters — score 9-10 (loyal enthusiasts who actively recommend)
- Passives — score 7-8 (satisfied but unenthusiastic)
- Detractors — score 0-6 (unhappy customers who may spread negative word-of-mouth)
Passives are deliberately excluded from the formula — they appear in the total but do not add to or subtract from the score. Calculate your NPS or see the step-by-step guide.
History
NPS was introduced by Fred Reichheld of Bain & Company in 2003, in the Harvard Business Review article "The One Number You Need to Grow." Reichheld argued that the recommendation question — easier to answer and more predictive than complex multi-question surveys — correlates strongly with subsequent revenue growth. The metric was developed in collaboration with Satmetrix and is now used by a majority of Fortune 1000 companies.
The 1-100 scale variant
Some platforms (including kazva.bg) use an extended 1-100 scale with proportionally adjusted cutoffs:
- Promoters: 80-100
- Passives: 50-79
- Detractors: 1-49
The wider range reduces the "ceiling effect" common in 0-10 surveys and reveals nuances in sentiment that a coarser scale would miss. The final NPS is still expressed in the -100 to +100 range and is comparable across scales.
What is a good NPS?
The headline rule: any positive NPS means more promoters than detractors. But the absolute number must be benchmarked against industry, not against an absolute target.
- Above +70 — world-class. Rare even among loved consumer brands.
- +50 to +70 — excellent.
- +30 to +50 — good. The bulk of healthy organisations sit here.
- 0 to +30 — adequate. Room to improve customer experience.
- Below 0 — critical. More detractors than promoters.
Published industry averages (Bain & Company, Retently, ACSI):
- Hospitality and education: +35 to +55
- Retail: +30 to +45
- Financial services: +25 to +40
- Airlines: +20 to +35
- Municipal services: +15 to +30
NPS vs CSAT vs CES
NPS is one of three widely-used CX metrics, each answering a different question:
- NPS — "How likely are you to recommend us?" Measures long-term loyalty and brand health.
- CSAT — "How satisfied are you?" Measures satisfaction with a specific interaction.
- CES — "How easy was it?" Measures friction and effort in resolving an issue.
Mature feedback programmes use all three together: CSAT for operational quality control, NPS for strategic loyalty tracking, CES for process optimisation.
How NPS is collected
NPS can be collected via any channel — email after a transaction, in-app prompt, SMS, paper survey, QR code at a physical location. Best practice is to survey within hours of the interaction, before the memory fades. Response rate above 20% is generally needed for statistical reliability; aim for 100+ responses before drawing firm conclusions.
Common mistakes
- Including passives in the formula. The formula is % Promoters − % Detractors. Passives appear in the denominator but do not get added or subtracted.
- Mixing scales. A 1-100 score of 90 ≠ a 0-10 score of 9. Pick one scale per survey and stay consistent.
- Calculating NPS from a single-digit sample. An NPS computed from 20 responses can swing 20 points just from one or two people. Always report sample size.
- Reporting NPS without trend data. A single number is less useful than the month-on-month or quarter-on-quarter trajectory.
Related terms
- Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)
- Customer Effort Score (CES)
- NPS Calculator
- How to calculate NPS step-by-step
Further reading
- Fred Reichheld, "The One Number You Need to Grow", Harvard Business Review, December 2003
- Fred Reichheld and Rob Markey, The Ultimate Question 2.0, Harvard Business Review Press, 2011
- Bain & Company, "Net Promoter System" research publications